Public trust in citizens’ juries when the people decide on policies: evidence from Switzerland

نویسندگان

چکیده

Facilitative political trust is the reduction in cognitive demand citizens experience when forming their opinions about issues. This type of important for generating legitimate democratic institutions eyes politically uninvolved citizens. The article develops and validates an original direct measure facilitative among voters receiving a voting aid compiled by Swiss municipal-level deliberative minipublic convening twenty ahead federal popular initiative vote on expanding affordable housing policies. Based perceiving randomly selected group as competent aligned with voters’ interests, we find reliable valid latent using confirmatory factor analyses same sample within municipality at two points during campaign, (N = 1159), again around time ballot 472).In subsequent multiple regressions, increases sores are main driver readers’ ratings both aid’s usefulness deciding how to they judge its information peers’ decisions.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

the impact of e-readiness on ec success in public sector in iran the impact of e-readiness on ec success in public sector in iran

acknowledge the importance of e-commerce to their countries and to survival of their businesses and in creating and encouraging an atmosphere for the wide adoption and success of e-commerce in the long term. the investment for implementing e-commerce in the public sector is one of the areas which is focused in government‘s action plan for cross-disciplinary it development and e-readiness in go...

Harnessing the Potential to Quantify Public Preferences for Healthcare Priorities through Citizens’ Juries

Despite progress towards greater public engagement, questions about the optimal approach to access public preferences remain unanswered. We review two increasingly popular methods for engaging the public in healthcare priority-setting and determining their preferences; the Citizens’ Jury (CJ) and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We discuss the theoretical framework from which each method is de...

متن کامل

Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.

Citizens'/community juries [CJs] engage members of the public in policy decision-making processes. CJs can be employed to develop policy responses to health problems that require the consideration of both community values and scientific evidence. Based on the principles of deliberative democracy, recent reviews indicate that findings from CJs have successfully been used to influence health poli...

متن کامل

Research priorities in urinary incontinence: results from citizens' juries.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to elicit research ideas, priorities and outcome measures from women who suffer from urinary incontinence. DESIGN Citizens' juries gather participants together for a combination of education and deliberation on a specific topic. The juries were held in November 2007. SETTING Women living in the community with urinary incontinence. SAMPLE Purposive...

متن کامل

Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens’ juries

INTRODUCTION The optimal approach to engage the public in healthcare decision-making is unclear. Approaches range from deliberative citizens' juries to large population surveys using discrete choice experiments. This study promotes public engagement and quantifies preferences in two key areas of relevance to the industry partners to identify which approach is most informative for informing heal...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Policy Studies

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1470-1006', '0144-2872']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2022.2091125